
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of ankle Kinesio taping on range of motion and agility during exercise in university students.
Cross-sectional study.
Thirty subjects were randomly allocated to two groups: taping group (n=15) and non-taping group (n=15). All groups underwent the same exercise program including stretching for 30 minutes. The exercise program proceeded in the following order: five minutes of stretching, a 20-minutes exercise program, and additional five minutes of stretching. Of the eight exercise methods suggested by Purcell
For ankle range of motion, the taping group showed significant differences in dorsiflexion and plantarflexion on both sides (
Kinesio taping increased range of motion and agility during exercise in university students. Additional research on Kinesio taping for improving range of motion and agility is needed.
Ankle injury is a common disease incurred during exercise with 85% of ankle injuries being sprains, and 1/3 of ankle injured individuals do not fully recover within a year [1]. Orthosis and taping are used as preventive means to protect the ankle joint. These prevent the ankle joint from an excessive range of motion, and enhance proprioception to adjust balance [2].
Taping is generally used to protect and enhance the joint to prevent further musculoskeletal damage during acute injury, reduce edema, limited the motion of weakened muscles of the injured joint to prevent additional damage from occurring during continuous exercise. In addition, taping enhances strength, the ability to react instantly, endurance to develop exercise performance ability, and parallel forces. Taping is divided into two major methods: elastic taping and non-elastic taping. In particular, elastic taping, the name of which is Kinesio taping, was devised by Gasegenjo.
Elastic kinesio taping is a recently developed bandage technique, attached to the skin. Kinesio tape is thinner and more elastic than conventional tape, producing less mechanical restraint and avoiding the mobility restriction experienced with conventional methods [3]. Yoshida and Kahanov [4] reported that Kinesio tape is theorized to have several functions: (1) restore are correct muscle function by supporting weakened muscles, (2) reduce congestion by improving the flow of blood and lymphatic fluid, (3) decrease pain by stimulating the neurological system, and (4) correct misaligned joints by retrieving muscle spasm.
Aguilar-Ferr?ndiz
Some theses have investigated the effect of Kinesio taping the ankles of some athletes on posture control skills and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. Nevertheless, the preceding research is insufficient to determine the effect of taping on the general population, because most participants were either athletes or patients with disease. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effect of Kinesio tape on general university students, comparing range of motion and agility in a control group. We hypothesized Kinesio taping would result in a significant improvement in range of motion and agility.
Thirty university students (mean age 20.97 years, height 166.96 cm, weight 63.90 kg) participated in this study. Subjects were randomized into two groups, a taping group and a non-taping group. The inclusion criterion were age between 19 and 25 years and healthy, physically active volunteers [7], with no history of osteomyoarticular lesion or previous fracture or surgery to the foot [8], free of cardiovascular disease or neurological injury at the time of the experiment [9], non-corrected neurological, vestibular, visual and/or hearing impairments, in addition to displaying no allergy to adhesive material [10].
General characteristics of the subjects are shown in Table 1. There were 9 males and 6 females in the taping group and 7 males and 8 females in the non-taping group. The averages for age was 21.33 years in the taping group and 20.60 years in non-taping group. The averages for height were 169.18 cm in Taping group and 164.73 cm in non-taping group and weight were 67.40 kg in the taping group and 59.87 kg in the non-taping group. This study was approved by the Sahmyook University’s Institutional Review Board. All subjects signed a written informed consent prior to participation.
The exercise program proceeded in the following order: five minutes of stretching, a 20-minutes exercise program, and additional 5 minutes of stretching. Of the eight exercise methods suggested by Purcell
The Y-type taping method was used. The taping method was attached with elastic tape on the medial heel, along the lateral calf muscle, and the other end was attached on the lateral side superior to the knee. The Y-type tape was also attached on the Achilles tendon along the midline of the calf muscle, and the ends of Y-type tape were attached together (Figure 5).
In this study, range of motion and agility of the ankle joint was assessed with a goniometer and the side Hop Test of the subjects. A goniometer was used to measure the ankle joint range of motion in the action of dorsiflexion and plantarflexion. To measure dorsiflexion-plantarflexion, an axis was placed on the lateral side of the ankle, the stationary arm was placed parallel to the axis on the ankle, and the moving arm was placed parallel to the lateral surface of the fifth tarsal. Participants’ full range of motion was measured.
The side hop test was used to measure agility [12]. Participants moved from the left to the right repeatedly for 10 times along a marked line at intervals of 20 cm. A stopwatch was used to precisely measure the duration time to 1/100 second. In measuring the right leg, participants jumped on a single leg from the vertical line on the left to the vertical line on the right, and jumped again to the vertical line on the left. Participants were told not to step on the line, and the left leg was measured in the same way.
SPSS version 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analyses. The dependent variables were the pulmonary function parameters. The general characteristics of the subjects and variables followed a normal distribution. The paired t-test was used to determine whether there were changes in pulmonary function between before and after the training. The independent t-test was used for analysis of changes in dependent variables between groups. Results were considered significant at
Differences in range of motion after the interventions are shown in Table 2. The taping group showed significant differences in dorsiflexion and plantarflexion on both sides (
Differences in agility after the interventions are shown in Table 3. All groups showed significant differences in left and right agility (
Range of motion is defined as the movable range of a joint’s potential movement. In other words, it is the angles through which a joint may be moved. Moreover, range of motion is a physical function and is affected by joints and surrounding muscles and ligaments. Range of motion prevents unnecessary energy consumption during movement, enhances accuracy and muscle activity during exercise, and improves coordination. However, injury may occur during exercise when the range of motion is less than optimal [13].
Miller
Agility is an ability related to accuracy, quickness, and easiness of a change in direction during exercise of either the partial or the entire body, and it is an ability needed to perform all kinds of sports [17]. Perrin [18] reported that intervals between skin and fascia or muscles may occur after taping. Once blood and tissue fluid are washed away through pumping action and muscle movement, pressure and pain are alleviated due to improved edema and internal hemorrhage, and a lowering of the previously exacerbated tissue pressure.
In the present study, all groups showed significant differences in left and right agility. There was a significant difference in left agility between the taping group and the non-taping group It is suggested that taping assist and enhances the ability to appropriately coordinate body movements and smooth muscle actions required to perform the agility ladder, figure-of-8, and zigzags as proposed by Purcell
There were two limitations to this study. First, due to a small sample size, it is difficult to make any generalizations. Second, this study was a pretest-posttest study, further studies are needed to investigate for the long term intervention effects of Kinesio taping. The findings suggest that Kinesio taping increased range of motion and agility during exercise in university students. We hope that Kinesio taping research for improved range of motion and agility will be conducted continuously.
General characteristics of the subjects (N=30)
Variable | Taping group (n=15) | Non-taping group (n=15) | t/x2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sex (male/female) | 9/6 | 7/8 | 0.536 | 0.464 |
Age (y) | 21.33 (2.72) | 20.60 (1.99) | 0.843 | 0.406 |
Height (cm) | 169.18 (10.98) | 164.73 (7.31) | 1.305 | 0.202 |
Weight (kg) | 67.40 (12.66) | 59.87 (10.52) | 1.772 | 0.087 |
Values are presented as n or mean (SD).
Comparison of range of motion with in groups and between groups (N=30)
Variable | Taping group (n=15) | Non-taping group (n=15) |
---|---|---|
Left dorsiflexion (°) | ||
?Pre | 15.13 (2.72) | 15.27 (2.79) |
?Post | 18.73 (2.05) | 16.00 (2.73) |
?Change values | 3.60 (2.77)* | 0.73 (3.06) |
?t | 5.029 | 0.929 |
? | <0.001 | 0.369 |
Left plantarflexion (°) | ||
?Pre | 36.00 (6.87) | 37.67 (6.23) |
?Post | 40.67 (4.17) | 39.67 (6.40) |
?Change values | 4.67 (5.16) | 2.00 (2.54) |
?t | 3.500 | 3.055 |
? | 0.004 | 0.009 |
Right dorsiflexion (°) | ||
?Pre | 16.87 (3.07) | 16.53 (2.97) |
?Post | 19.67 (2.29) | 17.00 (3.16) |
?Change values | 2.80 (3.12)* | 0.47 (2.33) |
?t | 3.474 | 0.777 |
? | 0.004 | 0.450 |
Right plantarflexion (°) | ||
?Pre | 35.00 (6.27) | 38.13 (5.99) |
?Post | 40.33 (5.81) | 40.00 (6.27) |
?Change values | 5.33 (7.90) | 1.87 (4.07) |
?t | 2.615 | 1.777 |
? | 0.020 | 0.097 |
Values are presented as mean (SD).
Comparison of agility with groups and between groups (N=30)
Variable | Taping group (n=15) | Non-taping group (n=15) |
---|---|---|
Left agility (sec) | ||
?Pre | 18.66 (11.31) | 14.20 (4.86) |
?Post | 13.43 (7.24) | 11.87 (4.18) |
?Change values | ?5.23 (4.27)* | ?2.33 (1.54) |
?t | 4.745 | 5.858 |
? | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Right agility (sec) | ||
?Pre | 18.00 (10.65) | 14.83 (5.10) |
?Post | 12.94 (6.75) | 12.03 (3.69) |
?Change values | ?5.06 (4.13) | ?2.80 (2.55) |
?t | 4.736 | 4.245 |
? | <0.001 | 0.001 |
Values are presented as mean (SD).