search for




 

Changes in Gait Patterns after Physical Therapy in Patients with Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: a Pilot Study
Phys Ther Rehabil Sci 2022;11:105-12
Published online March 30, 2022
© 2022 Korean Academy of Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Science.

Seonghyeok Songa , Namjeong Chob , Hyun-Joong Kimc

aEz Rehabilitation Medical Center, Yongin, Republic of Korea
bDepartment of Physical Therapy, Kyungbuk College, Yeongju, Republic of Korea
cNeuromusculoskeletal Science Laboratory, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
Correspondence to: Hyun-Joong Kim (ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6538-3872)
Neuromusculoskeletal Science Laboratory, 306 Jangsin-ro, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
Tel: +82-10-8005-1460 Fax: +82-62-958-7785 E-mail: hyun-joongkim@nmslab.org
Received February 25, 2022; Revised March 3, 2022; Accepted March 28, 2022.
cc This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Objective: Nonspecific low back pain (NS-LBP) causes pain and disability, affecting the neuromuscular system and altering gait patterns. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of improvement of low back pain symptoms through physical therapy on foot pressure and spatiotemporal gait parameters.
Design: A pilot study.
Methods: Participants received manual therapy and supervised therapeutic exercise, which consisted of 12 sessions for 6 weeks. Participants were assessed for pain intensity (a numeric pain rating scale), disability index (oswestry disability index), and spatiotemporal gait parameters before and after intervention. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to analyze the before-and-after differences in a single group.
Results: All seven NS-LBP patients completed the study without dropout. After six weeks of physical therapy, the numeric pain rating scale and oswestry disability index showed significant improvement (Z=-2.388, P=0.017). There was no significant improvement in both static and dynamic conditions in foot pressure (P>0.05). However, in the spatiotemporal gait parameters, there were significant differences in all variables except the right stance phase and left mid stance (P<0.05).
Conclusions: In our pilot study, 12 sessions of physical therapy in NS-LBP patients improved gait quilty in spatiotemporal gait parameters. Similarly, it has resulted in clinically positive improvements in pain and disability.
Keywords : Low back pain, Physical therapy, Manual therapy, Therapeutic exercise, Spatio-temporal analysis, Gait
Introduction

85% of low back pain(LBP) is non-specific low back pain (NS-LBP) without structural changes or inflammatory response in a specific region[1]. It is called non-specific because the cause of pain is not precisely identified despite the high prevalence[2], and most of the LBP treated by physical therapists in the clinic is NS-LBP[3].

Although there is no clear mechanism, various mechanisms are suggested in the pathogenesis for treatment[4, 5]. Changes in the neuromuscular system are linked to biomechanical variables (kinetics and kinematics)[6] and affect changes in movement. For example, abnormal excessive muscle activity, such as compensatory motion, results in slower motion and reduced range of motion[7]. The most common motion that can detect impaired motor control is walking[8]. Although there are not many studies on gait in patients with LBP, it has been shown that the step length is shortened and the ground reaction force (GRF) is decreased[9-12]. This means a decrease in the displacement of the center of gravity, as reported in LBP patients that walking is uncomfortable and walking speed is slow[13, 14].

Maher et al. [15] emphasized non-pharmacological treatment rather than pharmacological treatment in the continuous management of NS-LBP, and recommended that non-pharmacological treatment should be managed in systematic review with network meta-analysis[16]. Among non-pharmacological treatments, according to the results of network meta-analysis by Gianola et al. [16], manual therapy and therapeutic exercise were effective in pain and disability in immediate and short-term follow-up results.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of manual therapy and therapeutic exercise on the pain, disability and spatiotemporal gait parameters of individuals with low back pain, and the hypothesis is that there will be differences before and after treatment with manual therapy and therapeutic exercise for 6 weeks.

Methods

Study design

This study is a pilot study to analyze the gait patterns of NS-LBP patients. As an open-label, single arm intervention trial, pain, disability and spatiotemporal gait parameters were evaluated before and after physical therapy.

Participants

Seven patients diagnosed with NS-LBP and admitted to a hospital located in Paju were enrolled in a pilot study. Participants were patients who wished to participate in the study and met the eligibility criteria.

The inclusion criteria were 18 to 65 years of age, recurrent LBP for 3 months or longer, and pain score of 3 or higher NPRS[17]. Exclusion criteria were moderately obese persons with a BMI of 30 or higher according to the criteria of the Korean Society for the Study of Obesity, idiopathic scoliosis, spondylolisthesis, ankylosing spondylosis, spine fusion surgery, or a history of potential lower extremity orthopedic surgery[18].

Before the study, participants were explained about the purpose and procedure according to the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Intervention

Physical therapy was performed twice a week for a total of 6 weeks by a physical therapist with 7 years of experience, 30 minutes of manual therapy and 20 minutes of supervised therapeutic exercise per session.

Manual therapy was performed by combining mobilization and soft tissue techniques, which were suggested to be effective in improving pain and quality of life[19]. For joint mobilization, Grade III mobilization by Maitland technique was performed for the cervical and lumbar spine[20]. Cervical spine mobilization was added to influence pain control and functional restructuring by altering somatosensory processing and sensorimotor integration through changes in cortical plasticity[21]. The soft tissue technique was performed for the purpose of relaxation of muscles (suboccipital muscles, levator scapulae, rhomboid minor, erector spinae, latissimus dorsi, quadratus lumborum, piriformis, and hamstring muscles) that were mainly tightened according to each muscle imbalance state[22, 23].

Supervised therapeutic exercise was performed with a focus on core training. It consists of a 5-minute aerobic warm-up on a stationary bicycle or treadmill, and a dynamic trunk strengthening exercise and abdominal exercise. Six static stretches of the lumbar, gluteal, and hamstring muscles were performed once before and after exercise[24, 25].

Outcomes

Pain and disability

An 11-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) was used for pain intensity. A score of 0 is no pain and a score of 10 is the worst pain imaginable[26]. The reported minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was 2 points[27].

LBP-related disability was assessed using the Oswestry disability index (ODI). Each question is scored on a six-point scale into ten sections to assess the severity of pain and interference with several physical activities, including sleep, self-care, sex, social life, and travel. Scores are summed to calculate a score from 0 to 50. The higher the score, the greater the degree of pain-related disability[28, 29]. The MCID value for ODI was 12.88 points (sensitivity 88%, specificity 85%)[30].

Spatiotemporal gait parameters

The zebris FDM-T system (zebris Medical GmbH, Isny im Allgä, Germany) is integrated with existing treadmill machines to capture and analyze natural gait motions under various conditions to evaluate static and dynamic gait patterns[31]. Evaluated variables were static and dynamic pressures of forefoot and backfoot (Figure 1), and spatiotemporal variables (step width, step length, stride length, phase time, cadence, and velocity). The reported repeatability and sensitivity have intraclass correlation coefficients greater than 0.86[32, 33].

Statistical analysis

We used SPSS (SPSS 25.0, IBM Corp., USA) for all statistical analyzes. The general characteristics of all 7 participants were indicated and also descriptive statistics. All variables evaluated were compared between time points to find out changes before and after 6 weeks of intervention, so Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used. The statistical significance level (α) was set to 0.05.

Results

This study was conducted from April to September 2021. A total of 7 NS-LBP patients were recruited and there was no dropout. Table 1 shows the general characteristics of the participants.

Pain and disability

Table 2 shows the results of NPRS, indicating pain intensity, and ODI, indicating disability due to LBP. There was a significant decrease in NPRS after intervention (Z=-2.388, P=0.017). ODI was significantly decreased after intervention (Z=-2.388, P=0.017).

Spatiotemporal gait parameters

There was no significant improvement in all variables of foot pressure (P<0.05) (Table 3). However, it was confirmed that the forefoot pressure was increased in both feet as the changing pattern in the static condition (Figure 2). Although it was asymmetric in the changing pattern in the dynamic condition, it was confirmed that max force 1 was increased in the right foot (Figure 3).

In spatiotemporal gait parameters, significant differences were found in all variables except for Rt. stance phase and Lt. mid stance (P<0.05). However, the changes were similar.

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to investigate the pain, disability, and spatiotemporal gait parameters improved through intervention in the changed gait patterns of NS-LBP patients. Therefore, we investigated changes in pain, disability, and spatiotemporal gait parameters in patients with NS-LBP over 6 weeks by performing physical therapy consisting of 12 sessions of manual therapy and therapeutic exercises.

Our results confirmed that the reduction in pain was reduced through a decrease of 2.57 points in NPRS. The reported MCID is 2 points [22], which can be considered a clinically significant improvement. In addition, it was confirmed that the disability index decreased through a decrease of 19.43 points in the ODI indicating disability, and a significant improvement in symptoms was observed considering the reported MCID was 12.88 points [25]. These results were similar to those of Bade et al. [34], which showed significant improvement in NPRS and modified ODI through two weeks of manual treatment in patients with mechanical LBP. Although it is not clearly explained as a physiological mechanism, it is judged that manual therapy had an effect on symptom improvement, as in the results of network meta-analysis by Gianola et al. [14].

In the results of spatiotemporal gait parameters, we found that the stride length was longer in LBP and it was not a significant change, but considering the change in GRF, it is consistent with the previous studies[9-12] that the stride length was shortened and the GRF was decreased in the gait change caused by LBP. Also, in the gait cycle, a significant decrease in stance phase and double stance and a significant increase in mid stance, along with a significant increase in stride length, cadence, and velocity, mean an increase in quality as well as improvement in gait speed. Although there was no additional significant change, the symmetrical pattern of foot pressure in Figure 2 and the increase in foot pressure in the force curve of Figure 3 are results that complement the improvement of gait quality.

These results were similar to the gait characteristics of patients with LBP reported in other studies[9-14] on the inefficient forward movement of the center of gravity, decrease in GRF, shortening of stride length, and decrease in gait speed due to discomfort during walking. Therefore, positively improved results through physical therapy are considered to have contributed to gait quality change. Also, in a study on the relationship between pain intensity and gait characteristics in patients with low back pain, it was reported that 10% of the change in gait cycle duration and 74% of the change in speed were related to pain intensity[35]. In the results of this study, it is thought that a significant decrease in NPRS had an effect on the gait.

However, this study had some limitations. It is a single arm intervention study with no comparison group with a design close to a pragmatic clinical trial to identify improvement after physical therapy for hospitalized patients. In addition, it was difficult to enroll in a study that included gait analysis for LBP patients, and it was limited to presenting objective evidence in a pilot study with seven participants. Therefore, in further studies, randomized controlled trials with a larger number of participants and comparison group are needed.

Conclusion

We induced clinically significant improvement in pain and disability through 12 sessions of physical therapy for six weeks in NS-LBP patients, and there was no significant improvement in foot pressure, but partial improvement in gait quality.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures
Fig. 1. Force curves plot meaning max force at dynamic foot pressure.
Fig. 2. Changes in foot pressure in a static condition.
Fig. 3. Changes in foot pressure in dynamic conditions.
Fig. 4. Post-intervention changes in the gait cycle.
Tables

Table 1

General Characteristics of Participants (n=7)

Cases Age (years) Sex Weight (kg) Height (m) BMI (kg/m2) Gait speed (km/h)
Case 01 64 Male 72 1.65 26.45 0.8
Case 02 24 Female 85 1.72 28.73 2.3
Case 03 20 Male 68 1.69 23.81 3
Case 04 18 Male 56 1.59 22.15 1.7
Case 05 64 Female 62 1.58 24.84 1
Case 06 47 Female 70 1.67 25.10 1.4
Case 07 32 Female 52 1.57 21.10 2.5
Mean (SD) 38.43 (19.95) 66.43 (11.01) 1.64 (0.06) 24.60 (2.57) 1.81 (0.82)

BMI: body mass index, SD: standard deviation.


Table 2

Post-intervention changes in pain and disability (n=7)

Pre-test Post-test Z (P)
NPRS 4.86 (1.35) 2.29 (0.95) -2.388 (0.017)
ODI 43.00 (2.71) 23.57 (1.99) -2.388 (0.017)

Values are presented as mean (standard deviation).

NPRS: numeric pain rating scale, ODI: oswestry disability index.


Table 3

Post-intervention changes in spatiotemporal parameters (n=7)

Types Parameters Pre-test Post-test Z (P)
Foot pressure
Static (N) Lt. Forefoot 38.71 (7.09) 41.43 (12.14) -0.169 (0.866)
Lt. Backfoot 61.29 (7.09) 58.57 (12.14) -0.169 (0.866)
Rt. Forefoot 42.14 (11.31) 45.14 (10.09) -0.593 (0.553)
Rt. Backfoot 57.86 (11.31) 54.86 (10.09) -0.593 (0.553)
Dynamic (N) Lt. Max force 1 593.80 (120.76) 603.50 (127.00) -0.338 (0.735)
Lt. Max force 2 560.61 (110.46) 566.49 (126.35) 0.000 (1.000)
Rt. Max force 1 514.50 (226.25) 567.56 (117.64) -1.183 (0.237)
Rt. Max force 2 604.86 (120.77) 575.76 (124.03) -0.338 (0.735)
Spatiotemporal gait parameters
Stride length (cm) 73.86 (31.33) 99.29 (24.29) -2.366 (0.018)
Lt. Stance phase (%) 68.40 (3.72) 65.83 (2.53) -2.366 (0.018)
Rt. Stance phase (%) 67.57 (3.79) 66.01 (2.62) -1.524 (0.128)
Lt. Mid stance (%) 32.37 (3.82) 34.23 (2.63) -1.866 (0.062)
Rt. Mid stance (%) 31.49 (3.82) 34.44 (2.60) -2.366 (0.018)
Double stance (%) 36.06 (7.49) 31.46 (5.15) -2.366 (0.018)
Cadence (steps/min) 94.57 (9.81) 85.71 (10.37) -2.366 (0.018)
Velocity (km/h) 2.06 (0.86) 2.54 (0.67) -2.207 (0.027)

Values are presented as mean (standard deviation).

Lt: left, Rt: Right.


References
  1. O’Sullivan P. Diagnosis and classification of chronic low back pain disorders: maladaptive movement and motor control impairments as underlying mechanism. Manual therapy. 2005;10:242-55.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Hancock MJ, Maher CG, Latimer J, Spindler M, McAuley JH, Laslett M, et al. Systematic review of tests to identify the disc, SIJ or facet joint as the source of low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2007; 16:1539-50.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Wand BM, O'Connell NE. Chronic non-specific low back pain-sub-groups or a single mechanism? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:1-15.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. G?tze M, Ernst M, Koch M, Blickhan R. Influence of chronic back pain on kinematic reactions to unpredictable arm pulls. Clin Biomech. 2015;30:290-5.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Saragiotto BT, Maher CG, Yamato TP, Costa LO, Costa LCM, Ostelo RW, et al. Motor control exercise for nonspecific low back pain: a cochrane review. Spine. 2016;41:1284-95.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Heintjes EM, Berger M, Bierma?einstra SM, Bernsen RM, Verhaar JA, Koes BW. Exercise therapy for patellofemoral pain syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003.
    CrossRef
  7. van Die?n JH, Selen LP, Cholewicki J. Trunk muscle activation in low-back pain patients, an analysis of the literature. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003;13: 333-51.
    CrossRef
  8. Koch C, H?nsel F. Chronic non-specific low back pain and motor control during gait. Front Psychol. 2018;9:2236.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Lamoth CJ, Daffertshofer A, Meijer OG, Beek PJ. How do persons with chronic low back pain speed up and slow down?: Trunk-pelvis coordination and lumbar erector spinae activity during gait. Gait & posture. 2006;23:230-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Lamoth CJ, Meijer OG, Daffertshofer A, Wuisman PI, Beek PJ. Effects of chronic low back pain on trunk coordination and back muscle activity during walking: changes in motor control. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:23-40.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Zahraee MH, Karimi MT, Mostamand J, Fatoye F. Analysis of asymmetry of the forces applied on the lower limb in subjects with nonspecific chronic low back pain. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  12. M?ller R, Ertelt T, Blickhan R. Low back pain affects trunk as well as lower limb movements during walking and running. J Biomech 2015;48:1009-14.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Lamoth CJ, Meijer OG, Wuisman PI, van Die?n JH, Levin MF, Beek PJ. Pelvis-thorax coordination in the transverse plane during walking in persons with nonspecific low back pain. Spine. 2002;27:E92-E9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Lamoth CJ, Daffertshofer A, Meijer OG, Beek PJ. How do persons with chronic low back pain speed up and slow down?: Trunk-pelvis coordination and lumbar erector spinae activity during gait. Gait & Posture. 2006;23:230-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Maher C, Underwood M, Buchbinder R. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2017;389:736-47.
    CrossRef
  16. Gianola S, Bargeri S, Del Castillo G, Corbetta D, Turolla A, Andreano A, et al. Effectiveness of treatments for acute and subacute mechanical non-specific low back pain: a systematic review with network meta-analysis. British journal of sports medicine. 2022;56:41-50.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  17. Medicine ACoS. ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
  18. Simmonds MJ, Lee CE, Etnyre BR, Morris GS. The influence of pain distribution on walking velocity and horizontal ground reaction forces in patients with low back pain. Pain Res Manag. 2012;2012.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Hidalgo B, Detrembleur C, Hall T, Mahaudens P, Nielens H. The efficacy of manual therapy and exercise for different stages of non-specific low back pain: an update of systematic reviews. J Man Manip Ther. 2014;22:59-74.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  20. Saini S. Effect of Grade II and Grade III Mobilization by Maitland Technique in Low Back Pain. Indian J Physiother Occup. 2012;6.
  21. Haavik-Taylor H, Murphy B. Cervical spine manipulation alters sensorimotor integration: a somatosensory evoked potential study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118:391-402.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Arab AM, Talimkhani A, Karimi N, Ehsani F. Change in lumbar lordosis during prone lying knee flexion test in subjects with and without low back pain. Chiropr Man Ther. 2015;23:1-5.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  23. Arab AM, Haghighat A, Amiri Z, Khosravi F. Lumbar lordosis in prone position and prone hip extension test: comparison between subjects with and without low back pain. Chiropr Man Ther. 2017;25:1-6.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  24. Bronfort G, Maiers MJ, Evans RL, Schulz CA, Bracha Y, Svendsen KH, et al. Supervised exercise, spinal manipulation, and home exercise for chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Spine J. 2011;11:585-98.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Bronfort G, Goldsmith CH, Nelson CF, Boline PD, Anderson AV. Trunk exercise combined with spinal manipulative or NSAID therapy for chronic low back pain: a randomized, observer-blinded clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1996;19:570-82.
  26. Farrar JT, Young Jr JP, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94:149-58.
    CrossRef
  27. Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine. 2005;30:1331-4.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Yakut E, D?ger T, ?ks?z ?, Y?r?kan S, ?reten K, Turan D, et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Spine. 2004;29:581-5.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Fairbank J, Couper J, Davies J, O’Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiother. 1980;66:271-3.
    CrossRef
  30. Johnsen LG, Hellum C, Nygaard ØP, Storheim K, Brox JI, Rossvoll I, et al. Comparison of the SF6D, the EQ5D, and the oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc disease. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:1-9.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  31. Bedla M, Pi?ta P, Kaczmarski D, Deniziak S. Estimation of Gross Motor Functions in Children with Cerebral Palsy Using Zebris FDM-T Treadmill. J Clin Med. 2022;11:954.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  32. Reed LF, Urry SR, Wearing SC. Reliability of spatiotemporal and kinetic gait parameters determined by a new instrumented treadmill system. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:1-10.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  33. Faude O, Donath L, Roth R, Fricker L, Zahner L. Reliability of gait parameters during treadmill walking in community-dwelling healthy seniors. Gait & posture. 2012;36:444-8.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  34. Bade M, Cobo?stevez M, Neeley D, Pandya J, Gunderson T, Cook C. Effects of manual therapy and exercise targeting the hips in patients with lowack pain?A randomized controlled trial. J Eval Clin. 2017;23:734-40.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Bonab M, Colak TK, Toktas ZO, Konya D. Assessment of spatiotemporal gait parameters in patients with lumbar disc herniation and patients with chronic mechanical low back pain. Turk Neurosurg. 2020;30:277-84.

 

Full Text(PDF) Free

Cited By Articles
  • CrossRef (0)
  • Authorship and ethical issues