카카오톡채널
search for




 

Effect of Cytoskeletal Manual Therapy, a Novel Soft Tissue Mobilization Technique, on Axillary Web Syndrome after Axillary Lymph Node Dissection: A Case Report
Phys Ther Rehabil Sci 2022;11:464-70
Published online December 30, 2022
© 2022 Korean Academy of Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Science.

Hyun-Joong Kima , Seong-Hyeok Songb and Seungwon Leec*

aNeuromusculoskeletal Science Laboratory, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
bEz Rehabiliatation Medical Center, Yongin, Republic of Korea
cDepartment of Physical Therapy, Sahmyook University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Correspondence to: Seungwon Lee (ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0413-0510)
Department of Physical Therapy Sahmyook University 815, Hwarang-ro, Nowon-gu, 01795, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Tel: +82-2-3399-1630 Fax: +82-2-3399-1639 E-mail: swlee@syu.ac.kr
Received December 14, 2022; Revised December 18, 2022; Accepted December 20, 2022.
cc This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Objective: Axillary web syndrome (AWS) is a condition comprising fibrous band-like cords that appear in the axilla of patients after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) during breast cancer surgery and result in pain and reduced mobility. The cords appearing with AWS are hardened veins or lymphatic vessels. Manual therapy and stretching are recommended for pain control and mobility improvement. Therefore, this study investigated the effect of cytoskeletal manual therapy (CMT), which is a new soft tissue mobilization technique.
Design: A case report
Methods: A 41-year-old woman with AWS after breast cancer surgery and ALND visited a physical therapy clinic because of shoulder pain, decreased function, and decreased mobility. The cords were palpable and pain occurred 2 weeks after surgery. CMT was performed three times per week for a total of 6 weeks. Her pain intensity, range of motion (ROM), and shoulder function were measured.
Results: Measurements were performed after 2 weeks and 6 weeks of CMT and evaluated using the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). Her pain intensity largely decreased after 2 weeks (4-point score reduction) and after 6 weeks (5-point score reduction) of CMT. After CMT, her full ROM was restored and her shoulder function was improved (7-point score reduction).
Conclusions: CMT is effective for pain control, mobility improvement, and functional improvement of patients with AWS.
Keywords : breast neoplasms, lymph node excision, postoperative care, musculoskeletal manipulations
Introduction

Axillary web syndrome (AWS) involves the development of cords or fibrotic bands in the axilla after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) [1]. In one study, AWS was observed in 44 of 750 patients who underwent ALND [2]. Additionally, during a randomized controlled trial, AWS was observed in 57% of patients at 6 weeks after ALND [3]. ALND is performed for metastatic breast cancer. It has been reported that AWS observed in breast cancer patients who did not undergo ALND disappeared within three months [2].

The cords observed with AWS are hardened veins or lymphatic vessels that have transformed into fibrotic bands after ALND [4]. It is possible that AWS originates from the lymphatic system, and the cords associated with AWS cause decreased shoulder mobility and increased pain [5]. Natural recovery during the management of AWS can occur through revascularization or progressive collagen resorption [6]. However, soft tissue mobilization, range of motion (ROM) exercises, joint mobilization, and stretching exercises are recommended for pain control and mobility improvement [5, 7, 8].

Therefore, in this study, the effect of cytoskeletal manual therapy (CMT), a novel soft tissue mobilization technique with active and dynamic mechanical characteristics focused on muscle elasticity recovery, on shoulder mobility and pain experienced by a woman with AWD after ALND investigated.

Methods

This case study was conducted after obtaining informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The experimental procedure is illustrated in Figure 1.

Patient history and systems review

The patient was a 41-year-old female who was hospitalized to undergo chemotherapy for breast cancer. Her height her was 154 cm and her weight her was 46 kg. She had no other musculoskeletal disorders before breast cancer surgery. She experienced only mild swelling in her left leg during chemotherapy. After 10 rounds of chemotherapy, she underwent breast cancer surgery and ALND at the same time. At 2 weeks postoperatively, she reported palpable cords in her axilla, pain, and decreased shoulder mobility. This symptom was AWS, and it was judged that intensive manual therapy was necessary, so he was referred to a manual physical therapy clinic 3 times a week for 6 weeks as in the experimental design.

Examination

The pain intensity was measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) [9]. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale score ranges from 1.1 to 2.2 points [9, 10].

Shoulder mobility was measured using a goniometer to determine forward flexion, scaption flexion, and abduction [11]. During the measurements, the patient actively moved while in a standing position according to the assessor’s instructions. The ROM measurements obtained using a goniometer had high intra-observer reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.91–0.99) [12].

The simple shoulder test was performed to assess shoulder function. It consists of 12 items related to daily life with possible answers of “yes” or “no” the higher the score, the worse the shoulder function [13]. Its reported MCID is 2 points [14].

Cytoskeletal manual therapy

Although various physical therapy techniques have been suggested, this study used CMT, which is a new manual therapy technique. CMT has some similarities to active techniques, including voluntary movement (Mobilization With Movement®, Angular Joint Mobilization®, Active Release Technique®) [14-16], neuroscientific insights, and cell biological evidence. CMT is a soft tissue mobilization method that involves activation or inhibition at the neuromusculoskeletal cell level [17], breathing patterns [18, 19], and pain education [20, 21]. Furthermore, it allows for the correction of the active movement of the patient [22]. Technically, the aim of CMT is to provide selective transverse stretching stimulation [23, 24] rather than compressed stimulation [25-27] of the tissue to enable pain control, functional improvement, and cellular recovery.

During this study, CMT was performed to treat the adhesions of surrounding tissues caused by breast cancer surgery and ALND and the limited motion caused by the cords associated with AWS. Three 30-minute sessions of CMT were performed each week for a total of 6 weeks. Table 1 describes techniques for each body part of CMT. The body application area was directed from the periphery to the center. The pressure applied to each tissue was intended to separate different tissues rather than pressure, and a comfortable method of applying pressure with weight rather than force of the provider was pursued. The joint motion was passive and dynamic, and when muscle tension gradually decreased, active movements were performed.

Results

The pain intensity, ROM, and shoulder function of the patient who received CMT for 6 weeks were measured (Table 2).

Measurements were performed after 2 weeks of CMT and after 6 weeks of CMT. The pain intensity scores decreased by 4 points after 2 weeks of CMT and by 5 points after 6 weeks of CMT compared to the baseline score before CMT. Compared to the ROM before CMT, ROM after 2 weeks of CMT and after 6 weeks of CMT, respectively, improved as follows: forward flexion, 63° and 75°; scaption flexion, 68° and 68°; and abduction, 60° and 93°. Furthermore, the shoulder function score decreased from 8 points before CMT to 1 point after 6 weeks of CMT.

Discussion

Our patient experienced AWS after ALND for breast cancer. AWS, which is characterized by decreased shoulder mobility and increased pain caused by cords comprising fibrotic bands in the axilla, can be managed using manual therapy. During this study, the treatment progress with CMT, which is a novel manual therapy technique, was confirmed.

Pain intensity, ROM, and shoulder function were measured at 2 weeks and 6 weeks after CMT. The pain intensity score decreased by 4 points after 2 weeks of CMT and by 5 points after 6 weeks of CMT. This could be considered a clinically significant effect because the previously reported MCID is 1.1 to 2.2 [9, 10]. These results are similar to those reported by a meta-analysis of manual therapy after breast cancer surgery that found that manual therapy is effective for the controlling pain in the upper extremity (standardized mean difference = -0.62) [28]. Regarding ROM, an improvement of 60° to 90° was observed at 2 weeks and 6 weeks after CMT. These results showed a larger increase in ROM than that reported by a previous study of AWS management using manual therapy [5]. The shoulder function score decreased from 8 points before CMT to 1 point after 6 weeks of CMT. Because the reported MCID is 2 points [14], it can be confirmed that CMT has clinically positive benefits.

The clinical presentation of AWS includes pain and a pulling sensation caused by reduced cord mobility. Additionally, tissue adhesion after breast cancer surgery can exacerbate symptoms [29-31]. However, during this study, a significant improvement in mobility was observed at 2 weeks after CMT. Considering these results and the clinically significant changes reported previously, the effect of CMT seems quite positive.

CMT focuses on mechanical pain control based on biomechanical factors proposed by numerous manual therapy techniques. However, CMT is effective because it focuses on fibroblast and neuromuscular activation, and it aims to further restore the cell unit and improve function. The results of 2 weeks of CMT are similar to those of 2 weeks of physical therapy after ALND [32]. Furthermore, it has been reported that starting CMT at 5 to 7 days after surgery has a positive effect on wound healing [33, 34]. Therefore, CMT focuses on the physiological factors of stretching and the direction of pressure applied to the tissue to improve tissue strength and extensibility through the proper recovery of fibroblasts and homeostasis of the cytoskeleton [23, 24]. Postoperative adhesions cause anterior translation of the humeral head during forward shoulder flexion [35], and stimulation is transmitted to the long head of the biceps brachii [36]. This joint positioning fault can be explained by adhesion of the posterior capsule of the shoulder joint. Adhesion of the posterior capsule occurs secondary to the increased stiffness of the infraspinatus and teres minor [37] and the increased coupled force during forward flexion, which increase the compensatory action of the levator scapulae and rhomboid minor, thus causing tightness of the pectoralis muscles similar to that associated with upper cross syndrome [38]. Therefore, CMT was applied to the targeted soft tissues (Table 1), and the cords associated with AWS were relaxed along the myofascial pathway.

Conclusion

This is the first case report to describe CMT for patients with AWS after ALND during breast cancer surgery. CMT can lead to improvements in pain, mobility, and shoulder function caused by cords associated with AWS.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures
Fig. 1. Sequence of outcome measurements. POD, postoperative day
Tables

Table 1

Cytoskeletal manual therapy

Targeted soft tissue Cytoskeletal manual therapy
Regions Techniques
Biceps brachii ‣ Transverse local mobilization
‣ Hold and move
Pectoralis muscles ‣ Segregated local mobilization
‣ Hold and move
Infraspinatus and teres minor ‣ Segregated local mobilization
‣ Hold and move
Skin of the lymph vessel pathway ‣ Active and passive skin mobilization
Rhomboid minor ‣ Transverse local mobilization
‣ Hold and move
Levator scapulae ‣ ransverse local mobilization
‣ old and move

Images were obtained from Muscles & Kinesiology (Muscle 8.0.76, Visible Body, USA).


Table 2

Pain intensity, range of motion, and shoulder function of the right shoulder

Measurement Before CMT 2 weeks after CMT 6 weeks after CMT
Pain intensity (points)
Worst pain 6 2 1
Range of motion (degrees)
Forward flexion 105 168 180
Scaption flexion 112 180 180
Abduction 87 147 180
Shoulder function (points)
SST 8 1

SST: simple shoulder test.


References
  1. Cheville AL, Tchou J. Barriers to rehabilitation following surgery for primary breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2007;95:409-18.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Moskovitz AH, Anderson BO, Yeung RS, Byrd DR, Lawton TJ, Moe RE. Axillary web syndrome after axillary dissection. ANZ J Surg. 2001; 181:434-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Lauridsen MC, Christiansen P, Hessov I. The effect of physiotherapy on shoulder function in patients surgically treated for breast cancer: a randomized study. Acta Oncol. 2005;44:449-57.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Dinas K, Kalder M, Zepiridis L, Mavromatidis G, Pratilas G. Axillary web syndrome: incidence, pathogenesis, and management. Curr Probl Cancer. 2019;43:100470.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Fourie W, Robb K. Physiotherapy management of axillary web syndrome following breast cancer treatment: discussing the use of soft tissue techniques. Physiother. 2009;95:314-20.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Reedijk M, Boerner S, Ghazarian D, McCready D. A case of axillary web syndrome with subcutaneous nodules following axillary surgery. Breast. 2006;15:410-2.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Tilley A, Thomas-MacLean R, Kwan W. Lymphatic cording or axillary web syndrome after breast cancer surgery. Can J Surg. 2009;52:E105.
  8. Koehler L, Haddad T, Hunter D, Tuttle T. Axillary web syndrome following breast cancer surgery: symptoms, complications, and management strategies. Breast Cancer. 2018:13-9.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Michener LA, Snyder AR, Leggin BG. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with shoulder pain and the effect of surgical status. J Sport Rehabil. 2011;20.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Mintken PE, Glynn P, Cleland JA. Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18: 920-6.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Norkin CC, White DJ. Measurement of joint motion: a guide to goniometry: FA Davis; 2016.
  12. Mullaney MJ, McHugh MP, Johnson CP, Tyler TF. Reliability of shoulder range of motion comparing a goniometer to a digital level. Physiother Theory Pract. 2010;26:327-33.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Veeger H, Van Der Helm F. Shoulder function: the perfect compromise between mobility and stability. J Biomech. 2007;40:2119-29.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. McDowell JM, Johnson GM, Hetherington BH. Mulligan concept manual therapy: standardizing annotation. Man Ther. 2014;19:499-503.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Kim Y, Lee G. Immediate effects of angular joint mobilization (a new concept of joint mobilization) on pain, range of motion, and disability in a patient with shoulder adhesive capsulitis: a case report. Am J Med Case Rep. 2017;18:148.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  16. George JW, Tunstall AC, Tepe RE, Skaggs CD. The effects of active release technique on hamstring flexibility: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006;29:224-7.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Adler SS, Beckers D, Buck M. PNF in practice: an illustrated guide: Springer; 2007.
  18. Han J, Stegen K, Schepers R, Van den Bergh O, Van de Woestijne K. Subjective symptoms and breathing pattern at rest and following hyperventilation in anxiety and somatoform disorders. J Psychosom Res. 1998;45:519-32.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Tweeddale P, Rowbottom I, McHardy G. Breathing retraining: Effect on anxiety and depression scores in behavioural breathlessness. J Psychosom Res. 1994;38:11-21.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Kim H, Lee S. Effects of pain neuroscience education on kinesiophobia in patients with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci. 2020;9:309-17.
    CrossRef
  21. Kim H, Lee S. The Efficacy of Pain Neuroscience Education on Active Rehabilitation Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A CONSORT-Compliant Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Trial. Brain Sci. 2022;12:764.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Kim H, Song S, Lee S, Lee S. Short-term effects of joint mobilization with versus without voluntary movement in patients with chronic ankle instability: A single-blind randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci. 2021;10:1-9.
    CrossRef
  23. Curtis A, Seehar G. The control of cell division by tension or diffusion. Nature. 1978;274:52-3.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Davidson JM, Broadley KN, Quaglino D. Reversal of the wound healing deficit in diabetic rats by combined basic fibroblast growth factor and transforming growth factor‐1 therapy. Wound Repair Regen. 1997;5:77-88.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Langevin HM, Storch KN, Snapp RR, Bouffard NA, Badger GJ, Howe AK, et al. Tissue stretch induces nuclear remodeling in connective tissue fibroblasts. Histochem Cell Biol. 2010;133:405-15.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  26. Nekouzadeh A, Pryse KM, Elson EL, Genin GM. Stretch-activated force shedding, force recovery, and cytoskeletal remodeling in contractile fibroblasts. J Biomech. 2008;41:2964-71.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  27. Langevin HM, Bouffard NA, Fox JR, Palmer BM, Wu J, Iatridis JC, et al. Fibroblast cytoskeletal remodeling contributes to connective tissue tension. J Cell Physiol. 2011;226:1166-75.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  28. Kim S, Kim H-J. Effects of Manual Therapy on Upper Extremity Pain after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci. 2021;10:343-50.
    CrossRef
  29. De Groef A, Van Kampen M, Vervloesem N, Dieltjens E, Christiaens M-R, Neven P, et al. Effect of myofascial techniques for treatment of persistent arm pain after breast cancer treatment: randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2018;32:451-61.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  30. Cho Y, Do J, Jung S, Kwon O, Jeon JY. Effects of a physical therapy program combined with manual lymphatic drainage on shoulder function, quality of life, lymphedema incidence, and pain in breast cancer patients with axillary web syndrome following axillary dissection. Support Cancer Ther. 2016;24:2047-57.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Serra-Añó P, Inglés M, Bou-Catalá C, Iraola-Lliso A, Espí-López GV. Effectiveness of myofascial release after breast cancer surgery in women undergoing conservative surgery and radiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. Support Cancer Ther. 2019;27:2633-41.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. Beurskens CH, van Uden CJ, Strobbe LJ, Oostendorp RA, Wobbes T. The efficacy of physiotherapy upon shoulder function following axillary dissection in breast cancer, a randomized controlled study. BMC Cancer. 2007;7:1-6.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  33. Shamley DR, Barker K, Simonite V, Beardshaw A. Delayed versus immediate exercises following surgery for breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;90:263-71.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  34. Bendz I, Olsén MF. Evaluation of immediate versus delayed shoulder exercises after breast cancer surgery including lymph node dissection-A randomised controlled trial. Breast. 2002;11:241-8.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Surmeli M, Cinar Ozdemir O. The effect of upper limb lymphedema in posture of patients after breast cancer surgery. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2022;35:829-37.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  36. McMahon PJ, Burkart A, Musahl V, Debski RE. Glenohumeral translations are increased after a type II superior labrum anterior-posterior lesion: a cadaveric study of severity of passive stabilizer injury. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13:39-44.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  37. Izumi T, Aoki M, Muraki T, Hidaka E, Miyamoto S. Stretching positions for the posterior capsule of the glenohumeral joint: strain measurement using cadaver specimens. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:2014-22.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  38. Risalda P, Phansopkar P, Naqvi WM. Effectiveness of active release technique verses conventional physiotherapy in management of upper cross syndrome. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2021;15:246-50.

 

Full Text(PDF) Free

Cited By Articles
  • CrossRef (0)
  • Authorship and ethical issues